Civil disobedience is hot, which is why blogland was fairly unstinting in its outpouring of praise for Nick Clegg’s intended stand against ID cards. Now Huhne has stepped up with an open invitation to court action for saying, effectively “You’re a bunch of corrupt bastards. And you know you are.”
As I said before, gesture politics this ain’t. Neither is promising something they could only deliver in power. They’re opening themselves up to damage in the here and now. Those with subtle minds may wish to point out that Clegg was proposing to break the law (which was the aspect that caused dissent) whereas Huhne only a few days later has offered himself up to due process of law. But I suspect such refinement will escape most people, and a good thing too.
Because for my money this is proper cocking-a-snook anger. This is what people are not used to hearing from politicians. We’re in gallant underdog territory and heading for Robin Hood central. Our michievous Merry Men might be scrapping it out between themselves, but as far as the wider world is concerned, they are two top-flight Liberal Democrats saying interesting, honest, angry things. Much more of this and it’ll amount to a call to arms. We’ll be doing them and the party a disservice if we don’t go out and finger-write their quotes in the dirt on every white van in the land.
Seriously, could these be the opening shots in a winter-long campaign of Liberal fury? she said, daring to dream. There is a story here, a movement, a trend, call it what you will - I know that because I am a bumbling armchair pontificator and even I have spotted it. But the media, as usual, will suddenly decide to run off and play with their willies in some unguessed-at cause just when it is getting interesting, so what can we do to generate the publicity I think this deserves? Any ideas? Is there no stopping our chaps? Will future hustings have to take place via videolink because Nick is tied to the minute hand of Big Ben and Chris is lying down with his arms folded in the path of Gordon Brown? This much we know, I will have a very dirty finger before the day is out.
November 4, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Of course the real story is that Cleggie is proposing to break a law that has not yet been passed and may never be and Huhne is goading people with “libel” knowing that what he has said couldn’t possibly stand up in a court of law as libellous.
I think we should start a Pledge Bank to get them to spend a night in Campsfield “Detention Centre” or something similar….:) Or maybe to be arrested at a Faslane peace camp?
November 4, 2007 at 4:11 pm
I think that’s at the very least contentious. It seems strongly worded enough to be defamatory and he is not (here anyway) offering evidence to prove it – surely that opens him up to libel unless/until he makes a specific proveable charge (which he might well be able to). I imagine that while “the guvverment” couldn’t sue him, individual key figures could on the grounds that their reputations had been besmirched, since it is widely known that they were the key figures being questioned in the case. But then my knowledge is imperfect and I may be missing something big – you didn’t have to have any legal qualifications to edit Halsbury’s Statutes, disturbingly.
On the Clegster yes, I agree, but I also think Charlotte Gore made a good point about this – now that he has said it, it will be that much harder for the government in all conscience to enact. So in a way his statement safeguards him in the very making of it.
Still, rather as you imply, the impact comes from what they’ve said than the real-world background!
V good idea – but why stop at one night? Why not make them do a week-long roadshow of detention centres, prison cells, protest marches and motorway camps and then they have to do a hustings at the end without having any sleep? Dance for us, little candidates, dance!
November 4, 2007 at 7:01 pm
Yeh! Way to go boys!!!!
L